A short video deep dive on this topic. Prefer to read? The full post is below.
Marathon Petroleum runs at the highest operating margin of the major US refiners. That figure was 14% over the last twelve months, against a 9% median for its direct refining peers. For a business that buys crude oil and sells fuel on a thin spread, that margin advantage is what matters most.
The stock returned +165% over the past year. That sits above the +136% median for refiners and well ahead of the broad energy sector at +52%. Over the same twelve months the company produced $12.9B in free cash flow.
Even after that run, the shares trade at about 9x forward P/E. The broad energy sector sits at 11x. One figure points the other way, and we will not hide it. Analysts expect earnings to ease about 12% next year as refining profits cool from a cyclical high.
Our systematic screen did not form a view on the oil price. It flagged three things together: strong price momentum, the best refining margins in the peer group, and earnings estimates that analysts keep raising.
The two tables below summarise Marathon's scale and how it compares with its peers. All figures are as of October 15, 2026, computed from primary fundamentals and daily price data, and rounded. Hover any metric name to see how it is calculated.
The next table sets Marathon against two yardsticks: the median of its direct US refining competitors, and the median of the broad energy sector.
Two things in this table need a word of explanation. First, Marathon's margins look small next to the broad energy sector. That is the nature of the business, not a flaw. The sector median is lifted by oil and gas producers and pipeline operators, which earn high margins on each barrel. Refiners run huge volumes on a thin spread. Measured against other refiners, Marathon is the most profitable of the group.
Second, the direct peer set is six US-listed refiners: Valero (VLO), Phillips 66 (PSX), PBF Energy (PBF), HF Sinclair (DINO), Delek US (DK) and CVR Energy (CVI). Two of them, Phillips 66 and Valero, are also Veloris holdings. We flag that openly, so the comparison stays honest.
The chart below adds our own position to that snapshot. It shows Marathon's share price over the past six months, with our average entry price marked by a dashed line.
Marathon Petroleum is the largest independent refiner in the United States by crude-processing capacity. It runs refineries across the Gulf Coast, the Mid-Continent and the West Coast. These plants turn crude oil into gasoline, diesel, jet fuel and related products, which Marathon then sells and distributes.
The company has three parts. Refining and Marketing is the largest and the most cyclical. Midstream, run through its MPLX pipeline network, earns steadier fee-based income. A smaller Renewable Diesel segment makes lower-carbon fuel. The midstream fees matter, because they put a floor under cash flow when refining margins are weak.
The advantage is scale and refinery complexity. Big, complex refineries process cheaper, heavier grades of crude at a low cost per barrel. That is hard to copy, and no one builds a new US refinery, so the existing large operators hold a durable position. Marathon's size also feeds its midstream and marketing arms, which smaller rivals cannot match.
“Marathon earns more per barrel than smaller operators. Its scale, refinery complexity and midstream network are the reason, in a business where no new capacity is being built.”
Refining profits rise and fall with the crack spread. When the spread is wide, refiners earn a lot on each barrel. When it narrows, profit falls quickly. This is why the business is cyclical.
Marathon's recent results show the swing. The chart below shows quarterly revenue with gross and operating margin. Operating margin fell to about 1% in early 2025, then recovered to roughly 14% by the second quarter of 2026 as fuel margins widened. Revenue in that quarter jumped to about $52B.
Over the last twelve months Marathon earned a net income margin of 6% and EBITDA of $15.4B. It carries net debt of about $26.5B. That is a manageable load for a company producing $12.9B of free cash flow a year.
Marathon has beaten analyst expectations in three of the last four quarters. The most recent two beats were large: +22% in the second quarter of 2026 and +120% in the first. Strong results have pushed analysts to raise their forecasts.
The chart below shows how far. Over the last 90 days, the consensus estimate for next fiscal year's earnings per share rose from about $25 to about $56. That is a move of roughly +121%. Over the last 30 days, 12 analysts raised their next-year estimate and only 2 cut it.
Rising forecasts are one of the signals our screen looks for. Honesty requires the other half of the picture. Even after these increases, the next-year estimate of about $56 still sits roughly 12% below this year's expected $64. The cycle is forecast to ease from its 2026 peak. Analysts are raising a number that is expected to come down from here, not one expected to keep climbing.
At about 9x forward P/E, Marathon looks cheap against the broad energy sector at 11x. On EV/EBITDA it is 10x, a little above the sector. Its price-to-book is 7x, well above peers.
The low earnings multiple is cheap for a reason. The market is pricing in the expected decline in refining profits next year. The high price-to-book has a simpler cause. Marathon has bought back a large share of its own stock over the years, which shrinks book value and lifts the ratio. We read heavy buybacks as a sign of capital discipline.
Wall Street's average price target is about $442. The stock already trades above that, near $477, so we do not present the targets as upside. Analyst targets tend to lag fast-moving fundamentals, and analysts often raise them only after a company beats. If next-year earnings land above today's consensus on continued margin strength, the same multiple could support a higher target. That is a scenario, not a forecast, and the reverse can happen if margins fall faster.
Our screen applies no fixed valuation limit. It weighs profitability, the quality and growth of earnings, the direction of earnings revisions and price strength together. Which rules qualify a stock is re-checked each quarter on data the rules were not built on, keeping only those that still hold up. We will say it plainly: owning a cyclical stock after a strong run carries real risk if the cycle turns. How we handle that risk is the subject of the next section.
Marathon is not a personal pick or a bet on oil prices. It earned its place through the same systematic process every holding faces, and it must re-qualify every month. This is a data-driven, not gut-driven process.
The first pillar ranks a large universe of stocks on fundamentals, and whatever names and sectors post the strongest fundamentals rise to the top of the list. Marathon rose on profitability relative to other refiners, on strong price momentum, and on the clear upward direction of its earnings estimates. You can read how we build the universe in why we hold 15 to 30 stocks.
The Optimizer decides which qualified names to hold, not how big each position should be. Every position is equal-weighted within the invested part of the portfolio. At our current equity exposure near 55% across 16 holdings, each name is about 3.4% of the account. Marathon is sized exactly like every other holding. We explain the concentration limits in how the Optimizer limits concentration.
Every night, the system recalculates more than 20 risk indicators across markets and sets our equity exposure for the next day. It is built to control drawdown in broad market declines, not to predict prices. Today it has us near 55% invested, in Cruising mode. In F1 terms, we are cruising, not flat out.
One point matters for a cyclical stock like Marathon. The overlay reads market-wide risk and sets exposure for the whole book. It does not protect a single holding that falls on its own while the broader market stays calm. If refining margins drop while the market is fine, Marathon can fall and the overlay will not offset that specific move. The overlay helps a name like this only when its fall comes together with broad market stress.
For Marathon's own cyclical risk, our real defences are the other two pillars: a position that is only about 3.4% of the account, and a monthly re-check that drops any name whose strengths fade. Marathon's five-year beta is 0.54, so it has moved less with the market than the average stock. That is no guarantee in a sector downturn. The current positioning is detailed in our September monthly review.
Technology and artificial-intelligence companies lead many portfolios today, and our book holds nine of them. These stocks tend to rise and fall on the same forces: data-center spending, the chip cycle and software demand. When that theme cools, they often move down together. Energy runs on a different engine, so it can steady the portfolio when technology wobbles.
Our own portfolio holds 16 names across three sectors. Nine are technology names. These include the chipmakers AMD, ARM and MU, the flash-storage maker SNDK, and the server and networking firm HPE. The others are the electronics distributors ARW and SNX, the test-and-measurement maker KEYS, and the navigation-device maker GRMN. Three are energy: the US refiners Marathon Petroleum (MPC), Phillips 66 (PSX) and Valero (VLO). Four are financials: the banks BMO and BNS, the asset manager PFG, and the reinsurer RGA.
Energy earns its place in a different way. Fuel demand and refining profits depend on the physical world: how much crude is produced, how it crosses borders, and how much fuel economies burn. Geopolitical events that unsettle the wider market, such as supply disruptions or new trade restrictions, can lift fuel prices and refining margins at the same time. For that reason energy has often cushioned portfolios against inflation and supply shocks. We do not try to predict such events.
This is a tendency, not a rule. Energy is not a shelter from risk. Refining is cyclical, and in a broad sell-off most sectors can fall together for a while. Diversification lowers risk; it does not remove it. The honest claim is modest: holding sectors that run on different forces makes the whole portfolio less dependent on any single theme.
These names arrived the same way every holding does. The systematic screen ranks all sectors on the same measures, and three refiners rose to the top on their own fundamentals. We hold energy for what it adds to the whole portfolio, not as a view on any single conflict.
“The best operating margin among US refiners, a cheap multiple and strong cash flow put Marathon in the portfolio. The risk is the cycle. Our discipline is equal-weight sizing and monthly review, not a forecast on oil.”
Related reading: Why Drawdowns Are the Price of Long-Term Returns, How the Optimizer Limits Concentration, and our September monthly review.
Marathon Petroleum (MPC) is a current Veloris Capital portfolio holding as of the publication date. Phillips 66 (PSX) and Valero (VLO) are also current holdings. This article is for educational purposes and is not investment advice. We are a Pro Investor (previously Popular Investor) on eToro. If you choose to copy our portfolio, eToro technically replicates our trades proportionally into your own account, which you control at all times. Past performance is not an indication of future results. Your capital is at risk.
Important: Past performance is not an indication of future results. Your capital is at risk. CFDs are complex instruments. 61% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with eToro.
Monthly investment briefing — our live F1 status, month-to-date results against the S&P 500, what changed in the book and what's ahead. Optional instant alerts whenever we publish. No spam.